🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a very distinctive occurrence: the first-ever US parade of the overseers. Their qualifications differ in their expertise and traits, but they all possess the same objective – to prevent an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of Gaza’s fragile truce. After the hostilities concluded, there have been few occasions without at least one of the former president's delegates on the ground. Only recently included the likes of Jared Kushner, Steve Witkoff, a senator and a political figure – all coming to carry out their duties.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In just a few days it initiated a set of strikes in Gaza after the killings of a pair of Israel Defense Forces (IDF) troops – leading, as reported, in dozens of local injuries. Multiple ministers demanded a restart of the conflict, and the Israeli parliament enacted a preliminary resolution to annex the occupied territories. The American response was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

But in several ways, the American government appears more focused on preserving the existing, unstable phase of the truce than on progressing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. When it comes to that, it appears the US may have aspirations but few concrete proposals.

For now, it is uncertain at what point the proposed international oversight committee will truly assume control, and the similar goes for the appointed peacekeeping troops – or even the identity of its members. On a recent day, Vance stated the US would not dictate the structure of the foreign unit on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration persists to reject one alternative after another – as it acted with the Turkish proposal recently – what follows? There is also the opposite point: who will determine whether the forces favoured by Israel are even willing in the task?

The question of the duration it will need to neutralize Hamas is equally unclear. “The aim in the administration is that the international security force is going to at this point take the lead in neutralizing Hamas,” stated the official lately. “It’s going to take a while.” The former president only highlighted the ambiguity, stating in an interview a few days ago that there is no “rigid” timeline for the group to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unidentified members of this yet-to-be-formed global contingent could deploy to the territory while the organization's fighters continue to wield influence. Would they be dealing with a administration or a insurgent group? These are just a few of the questions surfacing. Some might ask what the verdict will be for average Palestinians as things stand, with the group persisting to focus on its own political rivals and dissidents.

Recent incidents have yet again emphasized the gaps of Israeli journalism on both sides of the Gazan border. Each source strives to analyze all conceivable angle of Hamas’s infractions of the ceasefire. And, in general, the reality that the organization has been hindering the repatriation of the bodies of slain Israeli hostages has dominated the coverage.

Conversely, reporting of civilian casualties in the region caused by Israeli operations has obtained scant focus – if at all. Take the Israeli retaliatory attacks in the wake of a recent Rafah incident, in which a pair of soldiers were fatally wounded. While local sources stated 44 casualties, Israeli television commentators criticised the “moderate reaction,” which focused on only infrastructure.

That is nothing new. During the previous few days, Gaza’s press agency accused Israel of infringing the peace with the group 47 occasions after the ceasefire began, causing the death of dozens of individuals and wounding an additional 143. The claim seemed irrelevant to most Israeli news programmes – it was just ignored. Even reports that eleven individuals of a local family were killed by Israeli soldiers last Friday.

The emergency services stated the individuals had been seeking to return to their dwelling in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of the city when the transport they were in was fired upon for allegedly passing the “yellow line” that marks zones under Israeli army control. This boundary is not visible to the human eye and appears only on charts and in government records – often not accessible to average residents in the territory.

Yet this occurrence barely received a reference in Israeli media. One source covered it in passing on its website, quoting an Israeli military spokesperson who stated that after a suspicious vehicle was detected, forces discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the car persisted to advance on the forces in a fashion that caused an immediate threat to them. The troops shot to neutralize the risk, in compliance with the truce.” No fatalities were reported.

Given such perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israeli citizens think the group alone is to blame for violating the truce. That belief threatens prompting calls for a stronger strategy in Gaza.

At some point – maybe in the near future – it will not be sufficient for all the president’s men to act as kindergarten teachers, instructing the Israeli government what not to do. They will {have to|need