🔗 Share this article

While dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained trapped in a windowless conference room, uncertain whether it was day or night. For more than 12 hours in difficult discussions, with scores ministers representing various coalitions of countries including the most vulnerable nations to the richest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as weary delegates confronted the sobering reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The latest global climate summit hovered near the brink of total collapse.

The major obstacle: Fossil fuels

Research has demonstrated for well over a century, the CO2 emissions produced by burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to critical levels.

Yet, during nearly three decades of yearly climate meetings, the essential necessity to cease fossil fuel use has been mentioned only once – in a agreement made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "shift from fossil fuels". Representatives from the Gulf states, Russia, and multiple other countries were determined this would not occur another time.

Growing momentum for change

Simultaneously, a increasing coalition of countries were equally determined that advancement on this issue was crucially important. They had formulated a initiative that was earning increasing support and made it evident they were prepared to dig in.

Less wealthy nations urgently needed to make progress on securing funding support to help them cope with the growing impacts of climate disasters.

Turning point

During the night of Saturday, some delegates were prepared to walk out and cause breakdown. "It was on the edge for us," commented one government representative. "I was ready to walk away."

The pivotal moment happened through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Around 6am, principal delegates separated from the main group to hold a private conversation with the head Saudi negotiator. They encouraged text that would subtly reference the global commitment to "transition away from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Surprising consensus

Instead of explicitly namechecking fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the previous commitment". Upon deliberation, the Saudi delegation unexpectedly approved the wording.

The room expressed relief. Applause rang out. The agreement was completed.

With what became known as the "Amazon accord", the world took an incremental move towards the gradual elimination of fossil fuels – a faltering, insufficient step that will minimally impact the climate's steady march towards crisis. But nevertheless a notable change from total inaction.

Key elements of the agreement

• Alongside the subtle acknowledgment in the legally agreed text, countries will start developing a framework to gradually eliminate fossil fuels
• This will be mostly a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will report back next year
• Addressing the required reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to remain below the 1.5C limit was likewise deferred to next year
• Developing countries secured a significant expansion to $120bn of annual finance to help them manage the impacts of extreme weather
• This sum will not be delivered in full until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "fair adjustment program" to help people working in high-carbon industries shift to the sustainable sector

Varied responses

With global conditions hovers near the brink of climate "tipping points" that could destroy ecosystems and force whole regions into disorder, the agreement was far from the "major breakthrough" needed.

"Negotiators delivered some baby steps in the right direction, but considering the magnitude of the climate crisis, it has fallen short of the occasion," stated one environmental analyst.

This imperfect deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the international tensions – including a Washington administration who avoided the talks and remains committed to oil and coal, the rising tide of nationalist politics, ongoing conflicts in various areas, unacceptable degrees of inequality, and global economic volatility.

"Major polluters – the oil and gas companies – were at last in the crosshairs at these negotiations," says one climate activist. "This represents progress on that. The political space is available. Now we must transform it into a actual pathway to a protected environment."

Deep fissures revealed

Although nations were able to welcome the gavelling through of the deal, Cop30 also exposed significant divisions in the primary worldwide framework for tackling the climate crisis.

"International summits are unanimity-required, and in a period of international tensions, consensus is ever harder to reach," stated one senior UN official. "I cannot pretend that these talks has achieved complete success that is needed. The gap between present circumstances and what research requires remains concerningly substantial."

Should the world is to avert the most severe impacts of climate crisis, the UN climate talks alone will prove insufficient.